Back to Resources
Comparison
Intermediate
15 min read

GPT-4 vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet: Complete Comparison

In-depth analysis of performance, pricing, and use cases to help you choose between OpenAI's GPT-4 and Anthropic's Claude 3.5 Sonnet.

Quick Comparison Overview

FeatureGPT-4Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Context Window128K tokens200K tokens ✓
Input Pricing$30/1M tokens$3/1M tokens ✓
Output Pricing$60/1M tokens$15/1M tokens ✓
ReasoningExcellent ✓Superior ✓
Code GenerationExcellent ✓Excellent ✓
Safety FeaturesGoodSuperior ✓

Performance Comparison

GPT-4 Strengths

  • Superior creative writing
  • Better at following complex instructions
  • Strong mathematical capabilities
  • Excellent code generation
  • Wide knowledge base

Claude 3.5 Sonnet Strengths

  • Superior reasoning and analysis
  • Better safety and ethical responses
  • More nuanced understanding
  • Larger context window (200K)
  • More thoughtful responses

Benchmark Performance

Reasoning (MMLU)Claude: 88.7% | GPT-4: 86.4%
Code Generation (HumanEval)GPT-4: 87.0% | Claude: 84.9%
Math (GSM8K)GPT-4: 92.0% | Claude: 95.0%

Pricing Analysis

GPT-4 Pricing

Input tokens:$30/1M
Output tokens:$60/1M
1K tokens example:$0.09

Claude 3.5 Sonnet Pricing

Input tokens:$3/1M
Output tokens:$15/1M
1K tokens example:$0.018
80% cheaper!

Real-World Cost Scenarios

Use CaseMonthly TokensGPT-4 CostClaude CostSavings
Small chatbot1M tokens$45$9$36 (80%)
Content generation10M tokens$450$90$360 (80%)
Enterprise app100M tokens$4,500$900$3,600 (80%)

When to Choose Which Model

Choose GPT-4 for:

  • Creative writing and storytelling
  • Complex instruction following
  • Rapid prototyping and coding
  • When cost is not the primary concern
  • Broader knowledge base requirements

Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet for:

  • Cost-sensitive applications
  • Deep analysis and reasoning tasks
  • Long document processing (200K context)
  • Safety-critical applications
  • High-volume production workloads

Migration Considerations

Switching from GPT-4 to Claude

Benefits

  • • 80% cost reduction
  • • Larger context window
  • • Better reasoning capabilities
  • • Enhanced safety features

Considerations

  • • Different response style
  • • May require prompt adjustments
  • • Different API structure
  • • Testing required for quality validation

Decision Matrix

FactorWeightGPT-4Claude 3.5Winner
Cost EfficiencyHigh6/1010/10Claude
ReasoningHigh8/109/10Claude
CreativityMedium9/108/10GPT-4
Context LengthMedium7/1010/10Claude
SafetyHigh7/1010/10Claude

Overall Winner: Claude 3.5 Sonnet (for most use cases)

Compare Costs for Your Use Case

Use our calculators to compare actual costs for your specific text and requirements.